Regulatory Orchestration: The Missing Layer in Pan-African Payments

Why Connecting Payment Rails Is No Longer Enough to Build a Truly Regional Payments Market

Africa’s payments ecosystem is becoming more connected.

Instant payment systems are expanding. Mobile money networks increasingly interact with banks and other financial platforms. Payment Service Providers are connecting merchants to multiple local payment methods, while regional initiatives are making cross-border transactions more practical.

Yet one major source of fragmentation remains.

A PSP may be technically capable of connecting several African markets through a single platform, but the regulatory requirements governing those transactions remain highly local.

Different licenses. Different KYC and AML requirements. Different reporting obligations. Different rules around settlement, foreign exchange, data, safeguarding, and consumer protection.

Technology can orchestrate payment rails.

But who orchestrates the regulation surrounding them?

This is where a new concept becomes increasingly relevant: regulatory orchestration.

Rather than attempting to replace national regulation with a single continental framework, regulatory orchestration could create mechanisms that help different regulatory regimes work together more effectively.

For Pan-African payments, that may become just as important as payment interoperability itself.

Africa Has Built Payment Connectivity Faster Than Regulatory Connectivity

The progress in African payments over the past decade has been significant.

Consumers can increasingly move money between banks, mobile wallets, merchants, and digital platforms. Businesses have access to more payment methods. APIs allow fintech companies to connect financial services much faster than traditional integrations once allowed.

The infrastructure is becoming more interoperable.

Regulation, however, remains primarily national.

A PSP entering another African market may need to navigate an entirely new authorization process even when its underlying technology and business model remain largely unchanged.

This creates a growing mismatch.

Payments are becoming regional. Regulation remains predominantly local.

As long as that gap exists, Pan-African payment expansion will remain more complicated than technical connectivity alone suggests.

What Is Regulatory Orchestration?

Payment orchestration coordinates multiple payment providers, methods, and transaction routes through a more unified operational layer.

Regulatory orchestration applies a similar principle to compliance and market access.

It does not mean creating one African regulator.

Nor does it mean allowing a company licensed in one country to operate anywhere on the continent without additional oversight.

Instead, regulatory orchestration could involve systems and frameworks that coordinate regulatory requirements across jurisdictions.

This could include:

• standardized regulatory information;
• reusable licensing documentation;
• common compliance standards;
• regulatory data exchange;
• mutual recognition mechanisms;
• coordinated supervision;
• regional licensing pathways;
• regulatory passporting.

The objective is simple: reduce unnecessary regulatory duplication without reducing regulatory control.

One PSP, Multiple Regulatory Environments

Consider a PSP expanding into five African markets.

Its core technology may remain largely the same.

Its cybersecurity framework may remain the same.

Its ownership structure does not change.

Its governance framework may remain largely consistent.

Its AML program may share the same foundations.

Yet much of this information may need to be submitted, reviewed, verified, and documented separately in every jurisdiction.

There will always be genuinely local requirements.

But there is also significant potential duplication.

As fintech becomes increasingly regional, regulators and payment companies need better mechanisms for distinguishing between the two.

That is what regulatory orchestration could help achieve.

The Goal Is Not One African Rulebook

Africa contains more than 50 countries with different financial systems, economic structures, currencies, legal frameworks, and policy priorities.

Complete regulatory standardization would therefore be extremely difficult.

It may not even be necessary.

The more realistic objective is interoperability between regulatory systems.

A regulator should remain able to establish requirements appropriate to its domestic market while participating in frameworks that recognize equivalent regulatory work performed elsewhere.

This creates a different model.

Instead of:

One market = one completely separate regulatory process

the industry could gradually move toward:

Common requirements recognized regionally + market-specific requirements handled locally.

That distinction could dramatically change the economics of Pan-African fintech expansion.

Regulatory Passporting Is Part of the Answer

One potential component of regulatory orchestration is regulatory passporting.

Under a passporting framework, a PSP authorized in one participating jurisdiction could receive a more streamlined pathway into another.

The second regulator would retain authority over the company's activities in its market.

But it might recognize certain elements already assessed by the PSP's home regulator.

For example, it might not need to independently reassess every aspect of ownership, governance, cybersecurity, or compliance if those areas have already been evaluated according to sufficiently equivalent standards.

Passporting therefore does not eliminate regulation.

It makes regulation more portable.

But Passporting Alone Is Not Enough

Passporting is often discussed as the solution to regulatory fragmentation.

In practice, it requires significant infrastructure underneath it.

Regulators need comparable standards.

They need mechanisms for sharing information.

They need to understand which authority is responsible for what.

They need processes for communicating enforcement actions and changes in licensing status.

They need confidence in one another's supervisory frameworks.

That broader system is regulatory orchestration.

Passporting is one possible outcome.

Orchestration is the infrastructure that makes it possible.

Regulatory Data Needs Its Own Infrastructure

Fintech companies repeatedly submit similar information to regulators.

Corporate ownership.

Directors and senior management.

Financial statements.

Capital information.

AML policies.

Cybersecurity frameworks.

Risk-management procedures.

Audit reports.

Operational structures.

Much of this information could potentially be standardized.

Imagine a trusted regulatory framework in which verified information could be securely shared between participating authorities.

A PSP entering a new market would not simply tell the regulator:

"We are licensed elsewhere."

Instead, the regulator could access structured, verified information about the institution and determine which elements satisfy its own requirements.

This would turn regulatory data into reusable infrastructure.

RegTech Could Make Regulatory Orchestration Practical

Technology can help.

RegTech has traditionally focused on helping financial institutions comply with regulation.

The next generation could also help regulators coordinate with each other.

Digital regulatory infrastructure could potentially support:

• standardized license information;
• machine-readable regulatory requirements;
• secure supervisory data exchange;
• automated reporting;
• digital regulatory credentials;
• compliance-status verification;
• cross-border risk alerts.

This would not automate regulatory judgment.

It would make the information surrounding that judgment easier to access, compare, and verify.

The same digital transformation that changed payments could eventually transform financial supervision.

AI Could Add an Intelligence Layer

Artificial intelligence could take regulatory orchestration further.

Financial institutions operating across multiple jurisdictions already face a difficult task: understanding how regulatory requirements differ and how changes affect their operations.

AI systems could help map those differences.

For example, an AI-supported regulatory platform could identify when a regulator introduces a new reporting requirement and determine which internal processes may be affected.

It could compare licensing requirements across jurisdictions.

It could help classify regulatory obligations and identify overlapping requirements.

For regulators, AI could potentially help analyze supervisory information and identify cross-border risk patterns.

But AI would need strong governance.

Regulatory decisions remain high-accountability decisions.

The goal should be AI-assisted regulatory intelligence, not uncontrolled automated regulation.

Compliance Could Become More Portable

Regulatory orchestration could also change how compliance infrastructure is built.

Today, fintech companies often adapt compliance processes market by market.

Some localization will always be necessary.

But many core capabilities are shared:

• customer identification;
• business verification;
• sanctions screening;
• transaction monitoring;
• risk management;
• cybersecurity;
• record keeping.

If regulators move toward more compatible standards, PSPs could build compliance architectures that are regionally reusable while still allowing local configuration.

That would make compliance more scalable.

Instead of rebuilding compliance for every market, providers could increasingly configure a common compliance foundation to meet local requirements.

Why Merchants Should Care

This may sound like an issue primarily affecting regulators and fintech companies.

It is not.

Merchants ultimately experience the consequences of regulatory fragmentation.

A business expanding across Africa may need different PSP relationships for different markets because individual providers cannot easily operate regionally.

That can lead to multiple integrations, contracts, settlement processes, reporting systems, and reconciliation workflows.

Regulatory fragmentation therefore becomes operational fragmentation.

If PSPs can expand more efficiently across markets, merchants may eventually gain broader payment coverage through fewer relationships.

Regulatory orchestration could therefore indirectly simplify regional commerce.

It Could Lower the Cost of Fintech Expansion

The current regulatory model can disproportionately affect smaller payment companies.

Large multinational providers can afford multiple legal teams, local entities, regulatory consultants, compliance teams, and parallel licensing processes.

Smaller fintech companies may have excellent technology but lack the resources required to repeat expensive market-entry processes across many jurisdictions.

Greater regulatory interoperability could reduce some of these structural barriers.

That could increase competition.

And stronger competition can ultimately improve payment products, pricing, coverage, and merchant experience.

Regulatory Orchestration Could Strengthen Oversight

There is another important point.

Regulatory coordination does not necessarily mean weaker supervision.

It could make supervision stronger.

Financial activity increasingly crosses borders, but regulators often see only the part occurring within their jurisdiction.

Better regulatory information sharing could provide a more complete picture.

A suspicious pattern identified in one market may be relevant to regulators elsewhere.

A serious cybersecurity incident involving a PSP in one jurisdiction could affect its operations in another.

A regulatory enforcement action may be relevant across several markets.

More connected supervision can make these risks easier to identify.

In this sense, regulatory interoperability can improve both market efficiency and regulatory visibility.

Preventing Regulatory Arbitrage Is Essential

Any system designed to simplify regional expansion must also prevent companies from exploiting differences between regulatory regimes.

A PSP should not be able to obtain authorization in the jurisdiction with the weakest requirements and use that license to bypass stronger standards elsewhere.

Regulatory orchestration therefore needs minimum standards.

Mutual recognition should depend on sufficient regulatory equivalence.

Participating authorities would also need clear mechanisms for information sharing, ongoing supervision, and enforcement.

The objective is not a race toward lighter regulation.

It is a move toward trusted regulation that can travel more efficiently across borders.

Instant Payments Make Coordination More Urgent

The expansion of instant payments adds urgency.

As money moves faster, regulatory and risk systems also need to operate faster.

Cross-border payment networks can connect financial institutions in seconds.

But compliance information may still move through slower, fragmented processes.

This creates an imbalance.

The payment layer becomes real time while parts of the regulatory layer remain document-driven and jurisdictionally isolated.

Future payment infrastructure will increasingly require both financial and regulatory information to move efficiently.

Stablecoins Add Another Cross-Border Layer

Digital assets make regulatory orchestration even more relevant.

Stablecoins can move across blockchain networks without following traditional geographic boundaries.

Regulation does not.

A transaction may involve a wallet provider in one jurisdiction, a PSP in another, a customer elsewhere, and settlement into a local banking system in another market.

Different regulators may classify and supervise those activities differently.

As stablecoin payment models develop, regulators will need increasingly effective mechanisms for coordinating oversight across borders.

Otherwise, the technology's global reach could significantly outpace the regulatory architecture surrounding it.

AfCFTA Creates the Economic Case

The African Continental Free Trade Area makes the case for regulatory orchestration particularly strong.

The objective of greater intra-African trade depends on more than reducing tariffs or simplifying customs processes.

Businesses also need to move money.

A company may be able to sell digitally into several African markets while still facing fragmented payment and settlement environments.

If commerce becomes regional but financial regulation remains difficult to navigate across borders, payments risk becoming a bottleneck.

Regulatory interoperability should therefore increasingly be considered part of the infrastructure required for Pan-African digital trade.

Regional Orchestration May Come First

A continent-wide regulatory framework is unlikely to appear suddenly.

Regional approaches are more realistic.

African markets already participate in different economic, monetary, and regulatory communities.

These structures could provide environments for testing deeper regulatory coordination.

Participating countries could begin with specific areas such as standardized licensing documentation or supervisory information sharing.

Successful models could then expand toward mutual recognition and passporting.

Over time, regional frameworks could become increasingly interoperable with one another.

Pan-African regulatory orchestration may therefore emerge as a network of connected regulatory frameworks rather than one centralized system.

What PSPs Need to Build Today

PSPs cannot wait for regulatory harmonization before expanding.

They need to operate within today's environment.

But they can prepare for a more interoperable future.

That means building strong foundations around:

• compliance-by-design;
• documented governance;
• adaptable KYC and KYB workflows;
• scalable transaction monitoring;
• robust data governance;
• jurisdiction-specific controls;
• clear audit trails;
• regulatory reporting.

The stronger and more standardized these foundations are internally, the easier it becomes to adapt them across markets.

Regulatory readiness is therefore not merely defensive.

It is part of scalability.

DalaPay and the Reality of Pan-African Payments

DalaPay is a Payment Service Provider (PSP) helping businesses simplify domestic and international payments across African markets.

For merchants expanding across Africa, payment complexity extends beyond supporting different payment methods. Markets also differ in currencies, settlement structures, financial partners, consumer behavior, and regulatory environments.

DalaPay helps businesses manage the payment side of this complexity by providing access to multiple payment methods and multi-currency payment capabilities through a unified platform.

As Africa moves toward greater payment interoperability, stronger coordination between regulatory environments could make regional payments increasingly scalable for PSPs and the businesses they serve.

DalaPay is a portfolio company of Velex Investments.

The Next Layer of Payment Orchestration

The payments industry has spent years building orchestration technology.

Businesses can increasingly connect multiple providers.

Transactions can be routed between payment methods.

Payment information can be consolidated.

Failures can trigger alternative flows.

Complex infrastructure becomes simpler at the merchant layer.

African regulation may eventually need a similar model.

Not one regulator.

Not one rulebook.

But a framework capable of coordinating many regulatory environments while preserving the authority of each.

That is regulatory orchestration.

From Payment Interoperability to Market Interoperability

The concept also reveals a broader shift.

True Pan-African payments require more than interoperable technology.

They require several layers to work together:

Payment interoperability — systems can exchange value.

Data interoperability — relevant information can move securely.

Compliance interoperability — common controls can be recognized where appropriate.

Regulatory interoperability — national frameworks can coordinate effectively.

Commercial interoperability — businesses can operate across markets without rebuilding their payment operations each time.

Only when these layers begin to connect does Africa move from interoperable payment rails toward a genuinely interoperable payments market.

Conclusion

Africa's payment infrastructure is becoming increasingly sophisticated.

But connecting payment rails solves only part of the Pan-African payments challenge.

PSPs still need to navigate fragmented licensing regimes, compliance requirements, reporting standards, data rules, settlement frameworks, and supervisory processes.

The next major opportunity is therefore not simply more payment connectivity.

It is regulatory orchestration.

Standardized regulatory information, greater supervisory cooperation, RegTech infrastructure, mutual recognition, and eventually regulatory passporting could reduce unnecessary duplication while preserving strong local oversight.

The goal is not one African regulator or one universal financial rulebook.

It is a system in which different regulatory environments can work together as effectively as the payment networks they govern.

Africa has begun orchestrating its payment rails. The next step is orchestrating the regulatory frameworks around them.

‍